|
Pantykin Community: Will GOD punish me for wearing panties - Pantykin Community
Jump to content
Will GOD punish me for wearing panties
-
Group:
Admin
-
Posts:
8,577
-
Joined:
14-August 03
-
Gender:Male
-
Location:Europe
-
Interests:Cruising for sex in panties, webmaster of this site and trying to build a genuine active community, travel, collectables, motorcycles, and bargain hunting at flea markets etc
-
Sexuality:Bi-sexual
Posted 20 August 2004 - 11:26 PM
Let's presume your a God fearing Christian and you like to wear panties for whatever reason.
You know it's not harming others, but you seek some kind of reasurance that it's not a big sin, and God will not punish you, and condem you to hell.
So you pose a question to the so called Christian forums
Quote Is Okay for a man to wear panties that aren't real femine looking?
Read the Christian replies http://www.christian...goto=nextnewest
#2
Guest_Sasha_*
Posted 21 August 2004 - 08:52 AM
Hi Pantyholic,
In reply i would have to say that yes it is ok for a guy to wear non feminine panties,i wear navy blue schoolgirl knickers on a regular basis and i would not say that they look particularly feminine,in fact that is the reason i wear them,i have on the odd occasion been caught with them on by people who i would not ordinarily have wanted to see me in girly panties,and they have not said a thing.
Sasha
P.S I would say though given the opportunity all guys who take wearing girls undies even remotely seriously should wear the most feminine and frilly undies whenever possible and unfeminine undies only as a last resort.
#3
Guest_Dr_K_*
Posted 21 August 2004 - 07:50 PM
First off let me say thay I'm not religious in any why just to let you know that I have no aspirations in life what so ever other to be the panty wearing perv that I am.
That said I would think god would see us for the weak, frail, fallible creatures that we are and would not pass judgement on us for something as trivial as the wearing of a few cloths of the opposite gender, personally I'd think god would be more miffed about us making holes in some of his/her other creations {deer, rabbits EACH OTHER}, If there were to be any disapproval I think it would arize from the reaction it brings about in the wearer and that in itself would warrant no more than an occasional rise of the allmighty eye-brow. :wink:
If there are any concerns about judgement and condemnation it would come from the self appointed, self rightious members of church and state who believe themselves morally superior and run around making up the rules as they see fit and using god's name to make it all seem valid. As a matter of fact if I were god I'd be more pissed at them for making me look like a hard arse.
Having taken the time to read some of the answers posted at the christian site and I must confess they were a little more enlightened then I had antisipated but still made me glad I'm an atheist.
Quote P.S I would say though given the opportunity all guys who take wearing girls undies even remotely seriously should wear the most feminine and frilly undies whenever possible and unfeminine undies only as a last resort.
Sasha I agree 100%  but your statement brings up a point thats been on my mind for a while, it would seem that most of the blokes that wear panties choose to wear what I would term as very feminine to perhaps ultra-feminine where as most women wear plain cotton or nylon panties most of the time. Anybody got any ideas on why ? :?:
Dr K
-
Group:
Admin
-
Posts:
8,577
-
Joined:
14-August 03
-
Gender:Male
-
Location:Europe
-
Interests:Cruising for sex in panties, webmaster of this site and trying to build a genuine active community, travel, collectables, motorcycles, and bargain hunting at flea markets etc
-
Sexuality:Bi-sexual
Posted 21 August 2004 - 08:40 PM
Quote Sasha I agree 100% but your statement brings up a point thats been on my mind for a while, it would seem that most of the blokes that wear panties choose to wear what I would term as very feminine to perhaps ultra-feminine where as most women wear plain cotton or nylon panties most of the time. Anybody got any ideas on why ? :?:
[/b]
Well these are my thoughts Luke: chapter 6 verse 9
And he said unto the crowd "Men wear thy panties thath bear the wings of an angel" 
The answer as I see it is that plain panties, whether cotton or nylon are worn by the ladies for comfort as opposed to a sexual connotation.
However, if a lady wants to feel sexy and even maybe interest her partner, she will wear the sexiest panty available to her.
Whereas us men are just horny all the time.
Besides, plain cotton reminds me of the old Y fronts but put on back to front, which is a good idea anyway if you've just eaten a tin of beans
#5
Guest_Dr_K_*
Posted 22 August 2004 - 12:00 PM
And all this time I was thinking it was simply because we had better taste. I'll have to bow to your superior knowlege in pantyology. 
Dr K
-
Group:
Admin
-
Posts:
8,577
-
Joined:
14-August 03
-
Gender:Male
-
Location:Europe
-
Interests:Cruising for sex in panties, webmaster of this site and trying to build a genuine active community, travel, collectables, motorcycles, and bargain hunting at flea markets etc
-
Sexuality:Bi-sexual
Posted 22 August 2004 - 06:30 PM
Quote And all this time I was thinking it was simply because we had better taste.
Dr K
I'm glad you said that.
The stampede of feminists forces me to take cover and watch helplessly as the dear Doc gets pulverised and powderised.
Let us pray
#7
Guest_Dr_K_*
Posted 24 August 2004 - 02:51 PM
"Live fast, die young, and leave a good looking corpse" thats my motto, besides I'm still pretty spry and can give em a run for their money. :wink:
Dr K
#8
Guest_sheerpanties_*
Posted 11 November 2004 - 04:40 AM
NAH..NAH 8O JEESE HE WORE A BLOODY DRESS AND SO DID ALL HIS MATES...NOT TO MENTION GOOD OLE JOE....I WONDER DID THEY HAVE SUPERMARKETS ??
LOTSA KISSES SHEERPANTIES
#9
Guest_Anna_*
Posted 05 March 2005 - 12:15 AM
What struck me reading the posts on the "Christian" chatlog was just how antithetical to Christian charity (at least in my view) the post were. I think it's important to distinguish between the sorts of evangelistic and fundamentalist Christian sects that seem to serve as little more than an excuse for some to set themselves in judgement above their "lesser" brethern.
Personally, I stopped describing myself as Christian many years ago -- I was also raised in a sect that, by the "standards" of many Protestants is in fact NOT Christian, nor was it ever, though its members would not accept such a judgement. Still, I consider myself fairly spiritual in nature, and it pained me to recognize in my teens how sexuality was being used to manipulate and twist people to the will of their religious leaders, rather than serve any legitimate aim having to do with the actual teachings of Jesus (based on their being confirmed by at least a majority of the synoptic Gospels). The Gospels were written by men, after all, each of whom had their own hang-ups that had little to do with anything Jesus was actually recorded as having said. As for the braggart Paul, don't even get me started.
As far as I'm concerned, Christianity pretty much died (at least as an institutional incarnation of Christ's teachings) as soon as the ink had dried on the Nicean creed, and probably several years earlier. The creed simply provided the hunting license for "official" Christians to hunt down and kill the real ones.
:soapbox mode off:
-
Group:
Admin
-
Posts:
8,577
-
Joined:
14-August 03
-
Gender:Male
-
Location:Europe
-
Interests:Cruising for sex in panties, webmaster of this site and trying to build a genuine active community, travel, collectables, motorcycles, and bargain hunting at flea markets etc
-
Sexuality:Bi-sexual
Posted 05 March 2005 - 01:55 AM
This is what I found typical of double standard so called Christians.
Member wood162001 with only (1009 blessings) so he won't be allowed through the gates mutters
Quote If I found out my friend wore panties, I would laugh at him so hard I would probably cry. And then to confirm his heterosexuality to everyone just in case they had any suspision he may be arroused because he was attracted to a posting about Panties later scribbles
Quote I think women that wear boxers are sexy
Eh! But Member Marvin bless him is more concerned about him thinking women in boxers are sexy Quote No wonder there's so much promiscuity.
So would it be ok according to Marvin chapter 69 if he was to think that men in boxers were sexy, I dunno I just find these people so far out of it, it's no wonder that most of the troubles in the world are the work of these fanatics. Don't get me started on Priests and paedophilia rings
-
Group:
Spiders
-
Posts:
2,961
-
Joined:
17-February 04
-
Gender:Male
-
Location:Pagosa Springs, Colorado USA
-
Interests:Panties with lots of lace colors, yellow and PINK! Meeting another Sissy for Play.
-
Sexuality:Bi-sexual
Posted 05 March 2005 - 12:58 PM
Sorry I don’t really want to get into this right now or any other time in the future, but before I was Carlainpanty….. I was a….. well let's just say involved in the Christian Church. I have now fallen from man’s grace but not form GOD’s Grace. As for the Scriptures, yes it was man who wrote them but man was lead by the Holy Spirit of GOD and according to GOD’s Word all are save not by works but by the Blood of Jesus all you have to do is accept Jesus as your personal Lord and Savior. Please do not send me personal message on this, This is just between Me and God. I just wanted to set a couple of things striate
Sissy Girl
#12
Guest_Anna_*
Posted 05 March 2005 - 09:50 PM
Quote As for the Scriptures, yes it was man who wrote them but man was lead by the Holy Spirit of GOD and according to GOD’s Word all are save not by works but by the Blood of Jesus all you have to do is accept Jesus as your personal Lord and Savior.
I certainly have no wish to offend. I am, however, honestly curious about the logical progression here. Personally, though I don't entirely subscribe to the notion of Jesus as divinity (seeming to violate, to my view, the very notion of monotheism, among other things) I DO admire him as a great teacher of peace and tolerance. Would that people accepted his teachings, or that they even read and understood them.
But I have to limit myself to those teachings that can be confirmed by at least two separate (alleged) witnesses, given what is fairly well proven about the time lag, authorship, and process of canonization of what has come to be regarded as the Bible. One must consider how many self-evident mistranslations entered into the text from the time it was alleged to have been written until (at least) Jerome's translation into the Vulgate Latin text, on which nearly every subsequent translation was based until quite recently. Since I also have to doubt the agendas of translators of the last century or so, I'm left with the feeling that one must read the New Testament especially with a very conservative, careful view and not just accept the KJV (as so many seem to) as holy writ in and of itself.
I'm aware of most of the "fundamentalist" arguments against this view, and you are doubtless right that this is not an appropriate place for such a debate. OTOH, considering how certain famous closet cases seem to have provided the basis for most Christian "justifications" for hunting midwives, sacred prostitutes, and a whole class of people to which most would assume we belong, perhaps the topic is not entirely non-germane?
Anyway, I DO wish you peace in your beliefs, whatever they may be.
-
Group:
Premium Member
-
Posts:
216
-
Joined:
09-February 05
-
Gender:Male
-
Location:TN
-
Interests:Spanking, Japanese cartoons, Lingerie
panty size: 8,9 depending on the style and brand
-
Sexuality:Bi-curious
Posted 10 March 2005 - 04:34 AM
howdy y'all, i do not think that God will punish us for wearing panties. i'm a proud Christian who regularly attends church. I even wear panties to church. should it really matter? as long as one believes and is Saved, he/she has a place in Heaven one day. God is not counting sins. He sent Jesus to die because He knows that we will mess up because we're not perfect. don't worry about what all those self righteaos posers say about you. many of them say hurtful tings just because they wish they had the guts to be like us. God sent His only Son not to condemn the world, but so that it might be Saved.
MPL(much panty love)
-the Kinky One
-
Group:
Guests
-
Posts:
508
-
Joined:
15-January 05
-
Gender:Useless
-
Interests:Telling lies
-
Sexuality:Bi-sexual
Posted 10 March 2005 - 04:39 AM
ok I don't believe in life after death, and with that said, I'm not trying to be rude, but, even if there is life after death, why do you care?
#15
Guest_Anna_*
Posted 10 March 2005 - 11:53 PM
Quote ok I don't believe in life after death, and with that said, I'm not trying to be rude, but, even if there is life after death, why do you care?
I suppose, if YHWH had a definite position on the subject (besides the highly debatable Levitical verses), and there was an afterlife (something hardly assured under Judaism), then it might very well matter.
Of course, in a "Christian" State of the sort Margaret Atwood described in The Handmaid's Tale, where levitical law might also be civil law, it would also matter in this world, never mind the existence (or not) of an afterlife.
Sorry if you were kidding and I've walked into the gag. 
-
Group:
Admin
-
Posts:
8,577
-
Joined:
14-August 03
-
Gender:Male
-
Location:Europe
-
Interests:Cruising for sex in panties, webmaster of this site and trying to build a genuine active community, travel, collectables, motorcycles, and bargain hunting at flea markets etc
-
Sexuality:Bi-sexual
Posted 11 March 2005 - 11:31 PM
Quote ok I don't believe in life after death, and with that said, I'm not trying to be rude, but, even if there is life after death, why do you care?
Because we are worried about the what to wear and what to pack in our suitcases and make-up bag!
#17
Guest_Under_Armour_Panties_*
Posted 12 March 2005 - 06:14 AM
Pantyholic,
I am a born again Christian and after I heard Deuteronomy 22:5 quoted on the radio, I am so confused. I am seriously a devout Evangelical. I've been confused for awhile. I've thrown my lingerie out many times and I've confessed this issue to 3 different Christian men who have served as mentors to me that I really trust in. Yet I've had this raging fetish since I was 5 and am now 21. Honestly I just love this fetish I have. I've prayed, confessed it, thrown my stuff away but I keep finding myself buying more. I would love to seriously talk to you about this. I sent you a private message with my e-mail address if you want to talk.
In Christ (or am I?),
Under Armour Panties
-
Group:
Admin
-
Posts:
8,577
-
Joined:
14-August 03
-
Gender:Male
-
Location:Europe
-
Interests:Cruising for sex in panties, webmaster of this site and trying to build a genuine active community, travel, collectables, motorcycles, and bargain hunting at flea markets etc
-
Sexuality:Bi-sexual
Posted 12 March 2005 - 07:00 AM
First of all UAP I am not qualified or do I have any knowledge of the bible other than the 10 commandments which I saw at the pictures and a few other bits and pieces which I had to suffer through at school, as for chapters and verses forget it I cannot even remember my own telephone number sometimes.
My philosophy is this, if you try to live your life the best way you can, without harming or killing others, and then by helping others whenever you can, then for me personaly that pleases my God, and my God is my conscience.
This Topic wasn't started because we question what we love doing, it was because people who through there own labelling THINK they have the right to criticise others, and if given the chance (with me anyway) can dictate how they live their lives! according to their values.
I think it sad when young people loose their way, and sometimes through desperation waste the best years of their life working for some religious company, in my opinion working for a charity would be far more beneficial and rewarding in the real world.
UAP if you want to be part of this community we ask of nothing, you can come and go as you please, you will not be asked to go knocking on folks doors trying to convert them to pantyism, you will be among others who have similar interests as yourself, and next time you have a clear out can you send me your trash bin ..... but please don't do it, there will come a time when you will live to regret it.
Ps. I am not looking for help so don't be confused over my mutterings :wink:
-
Group:
Premium Member
-
Posts:
216
-
Joined:
09-February 05
-
Gender:Male
-
Location:TN
-
Interests:Spanking, Japanese cartoons, Lingerie
panty size: 8,9 depending on the style and brand
-
Sexuality:Bi-curious
Posted 12 March 2005 - 07:20 PM
Pantyholic, i could not have stated it better myself. i have gotten rid of my stash once, and i regretted it. i tried to not wear panties again. i didn't last a month. it ate at me. everyone has their thing. atleast ours isn't anything dangerous or illegal.
#20
Guest_Anna_*
Posted 13 March 2005 - 04:20 PM
Quote I am a born again Christian and after I heard Deuteronomy 22:5 quoted on the radio, I am so confused. I am seriously a devout Evangelical. I've been confused for awhile.
I clearly can't tell you what to believe, not being an evangelical myself. I can bring up the context of the verse, though, and mention that in all my study I have yet to come across a really meaningful explanation of the reasoning behind the verse, other than that it comes in among a number of others dealing with "purity" in the sense of not mixing opposites (or even different classes of materials). To my knowledge, unlike most things in the OT, there is practically no useful Midrash (oral commentary and legend) pertinent to this particular verse. None that I've been made aware of, at least, and none that has come to my attention in a fair amount of searching.
FWIW, I would think that you should only worry about this if you ALSO believe and practice the prohibitions against mixing linen and wool, for instance, or any of the other more obscure laws that applied to the Ancient Hebrews, but which most Christians tend to believe were superceded by Jesus and His "higher" teachings. To my knowledge, only a minority of the most rigidly orthodox Jews adhere to ALL the laws set down in Deut. and Leviticus.
If you're dressing in order to accomplish some evil ends (to sneak into your neighbor's harem and defile his wives or daughters, let's say) then dressing is evil, not in and of itself, but because of the reasons it is being done.
Otherwise, where's the harm, especially now, in an era when virtually all civil vestimentary laws have been voided? What do I mean by that?
In Shakespeare's time and earlier, certain fabrics and colors were only allowed to be worn by priests, princes or others of high station. Wearing garments of another class was considered an act of false representation, and a serious crime.
To me, it all boils down to whether there is intent to do harm.
Personally, I have to admit here that I have a bit of a problem with Judeo-Christian tradition in that (unlike what I feel are probably the majority of other world cultures) there is little or no tolerance of the notion that some people are simply born with atypical traits and features that have usually been handled, in practical terms, by granting them a particular, recognized status in the community, thus allowing them to be themselves and contribute constructively, rather than live their lives tortured by guilt they've been conditioned to feel by the structure of their communities. In many Native American tribes, for instance, there is a defined role for those who strongly identify with women, and it is every bit as defined and demanding as the gender roles of typical men and women, even though it is not precisely a copy of either of the more common sex roles.
I could go on and on with this... I really should keep a file handy with the gist of what I've studied over the last 15 years or more. Rather than perseverate here, though, I'll leave my views standing at this point.
|
|
Sign In
Register
Help
MultiQuote