Sissy or manly Sexuality
#1
Posted 11 November 2005 - 01:36 PM
We are more manly than men who don't wear panties.
I intend to carry out a full survey and publish my report to the general medical council, I could become as famous as Darwin.
I might just keep it to my self and be more discrete, I think the world may not be ready for my ideas.
Professor Mandy x
#7
Posted 13 November 2005 - 11:09 AM
You have made my point perfectly. It is men like you to whom I was refering.
You are a man's man working in a man's envionment. I bet you wouldn't dare even think of telling any of your workmates about this site let alone let them know your special secret, would you?
But you visit a special part of you that longs to be Fem. You get off by being girly wearing sexy panties etc. It is great isn't it?
I am like you, I am outwardly a straight manly type but I have strong sexual urges. My needing to be Fem at times I put down to having plenty male sex hormones. So, you and I could be said to be more manly than our workmates who haven't visited the other side.
Mandy x
#8
Posted 13 November 2005 - 06:45 PM
#9 Guest_fun12play_*
Posted 13 November 2005 - 07:12 PM
You broach an interesting subject. For starters if one is straight then it seems its for the feminie feeling, the thrill of doing something others arn't aware of or the desire to experience a more feminie relationship with a woman.
I am bi and oddly enough I could play the submissive role or the dominant role. It would all depend on my partner.
But so much for all of that - children require my attention - I'll get back to this later.......
#10
Posted 13 November 2005 - 08:13 PM
Satinpty
#11
Posted 13 November 2005 - 09:04 PM
I don't think manly is the correct word, if Mr X enjoyed living on the edge by climbing mountains unaided, does that make him more manly than Mr Y who wears panties, or more crazy?
Is a man who works as a mechanic, more manly than a man who works in a hairdressers?
I think we all have our own different perceptions, likes and dislikes, making it rather difficult to call someone/people as manly based on a specific thing.
#12
Posted 14 November 2005 - 06:15 AM
Pantyholic, on Nov 13 2005, 04:59 PM, said:
I don't think manly is the correct word, if Mr X enjoyed living on the edge by climbing mountains unaided, does that make him more manly than Mr Y who wears panties, or more crazy?
Is a man who works as a mechanic, more manly than a man who works in a hairdressers?
I think we all have our own different perceptions, likes and dislikes, making it rather difficult to call someone/people as manly based on a specific thing.
Exactly PH ... What a man or a woman does for a living or for recreation has very little to do with their gender-mind or their sexual preferences (in my opinion anyway).
I myself am Bi-Gendered ... meaning I have both a strong masculine side and a well defined but softer feminine side to my persona .. and both of them work together 24/7 to make me the total person I am every minute of everyday ... While my sexual preference leans towards ST8 or lesbian sex with another feminine person (of either gender) I also have Bi-Sexual tendencies and feelings which magnify themselves when ever I am dressed in feminine clothing or lingerie and around a gentle, affectionate, understanding man who is willing to look beyond my gender of birth and allow me to be myself and use all my talents and charms to pleasure both of us in whatever way we both agree and desire.
So do I wear Ultra Feminine lingerie because I love it or because it arouses me sexually? Yes for both reasons but I do not worry about which one is more prevalent I just love being allowed to be me for what ever reason I choose at the time.
Your Sister & Friend in Panties Always,
Michelle Jo
#13
Posted 15 November 2005 - 09:54 PM
I hope that I haven't upset anyone as that was not my intention.
It was simply the idea that made me smile, a man wearing frilly panties might have more testostorone than a hurly burly he-man.
A very sorry mandy.
#14
Posted 15 November 2005 - 11:01 PM
This new theory might of put pantykin on the front page of New Scientist, so in a way I'm a bit disappointed
Although I guess it would be true to say that some men who wear panties have more testosterone than say someones perception of a mans man, who for instance is into body building, chews on steroids, and needs a splint taped to his cock in order to get the bugger upright.......... no offence intended to muscley men by the way
#15
Posted 16 November 2005 - 07:14 AM
Big Hug from Kansas,
Michelle Jo
#16
Posted 16 November 2005 - 01:13 PM
#17
Posted 16 November 2005 - 02:56 PM
#18
Posted 16 November 2005 - 05:04 PM
carlainpanty, on Nov 16 2005, 09:08 AM, said:
.... and you look so Sexy & Hot in them ...
Hugs from Kansas,
Michelle Jo
#20 Guest_Anna_*
Posted 16 November 2005 - 11:53 PM
mandyboy, on Nov 15 2005, 06:49 PM, said:
I hope that I haven't upset anyone as that was not my intention.
It was simply the idea that made me smile, a man wearing frilly panties might have more testostorone than a hurly burly he-man.
A very sorry mandy.
The diversity of panty-wearers (and their motives) is probably too great to be of much real value. Also, this thread demonstrates just how difficult it is, even to agree on definitions vis a vis just what makes for a "manly man."
But I do believe your observation has some merit. However, it's my sad duty to inform you that this observation has already been set down in the psycho-medical literature on cross-dressing (and related) behaviors, at least where they fit the model of paraphilias. And it even has some credence among a subset of those who seek sex reassignment therapies -- that is, hormones and (sometimes) surgery.
(I also appreciate that this all stemmed from a little jest and pray I won't get completely flamed for posting the VERY shortest version -- or at least the shortest I could manage, which is not saying much.)

Sign In
Register
Help


MultiQuote

